One of the reasons I'd favor the 840 Pro is that it's already been around for long enough to have all the quirks worked out.
#Cheapest quickbooks pro upgrade online series
That looks like a decent starting place, but what's with the terrible IOPS?Īgreed on Intel>Seagate>Samsung, except that as far as I'm aware Seagate is still a bit of a newbie in the SSD field and their 600 series hasn't been around all that long. And any particular SSD you'd recommend for our use case? Most anything will be stupid fast compared to our current system I'm mostly concerned with long-term reliability and relatively civilized pricing. Will the Gen8 you linked to handle standard 2.5" SSDs alright? That was a complaint in several reviews I've seen. No better way to make 100BT feel like 10BT than a fat nonsequential file transfer.
Whatever the case, an SSD would be really nice for making sure everyone has speedy QBE and network access while 3-4 of us are moving big files around. We've kind of hammered the tech budget recently between launching a web store with a custom API integration, hiring a high-end SEO firm (seo.com), new employees, and fairly nice new laptops or dual 24" monitor desktops for everyone. I'm sold on ECC btw - fair point about bit flipping.ĭon't wanna cheap out, but any smart cost savings is a good thing. I don't know much about QBE though - thoughts? We might actually be a candidate for a Kabini/Atom 4-8T server. Shouldn't need much single-thread performance, but having 4-8 moderate threads might be useful.
And considering that we're bringing in a steady trickle of new people, we should probably go with 8GB for future-proofing.Īlso not sure if a 2C/2T CPU will work for us - our office has I believe 15 QBE users (luckily I'm not one of them), many of which use it pretty heavily throughout the day (and again, new people are trickling in). I'm sure the current server warranty is long expired.Īhh, that helps a lot although I expect we'll still be paying a premium for HP memory? 2GB isn't gonna cut it - the current server has 4GB with 2-3GB usually in use. And with wins in power bill, performance, and reliability (minus the ECC issue) it sounds like a win to me. What do you guys think? We'd lose ECC memory and a few other niceties, but for a mission like this I'm not convinced it'd matter anyway. Power usage would drop over 90% (and we're out in the sticks so power's on the expensive side), performance and reliability would both improve significantly with the SSD, and we could sell the old server for I'd imagine at least 500 - enough to recover most of our initial investment right off the bat. If we go with the NUC, the CPU should at least be competitive with such an old Xeon, and a single 500G SSD should be much more reliable than old HDs in RAID (and we've got Carbonite anyway). It eats a bit over 200W idle and generally the most intense things it does are serve Quickbooks and hold about 200G of total office files. No web duties or other CPU heavy stuff.Ĭurrently we've got a server with Xeon 3430 with 4G RAM, 40G boot drive, and 2x500G HDs in RAID1. What do you guys think about using a Haswell NUC/Brix for WinServer 2008/2012? Duties would be Active Directory accounts for ~20 people and Quickbooks Enterprise 2013, primarily.
0 kommentar(er)
